Skip to content

Guide · Approval

How to automate contract approval

How do you move from approvals by e-mail to a tracked, fast flow assigned to the right roles?

Automating ≠ removing human judgement

Automating approval means routing the right file to the right person at the right time, with a visible status and a record of every decision. It does not mean having an AI sign a contract. This guide shows how to digitise the flow without making your organisation rigid.

Method: from the real process to a published workflow

Start from what actually happens (not the ideal process on a PowerPoint slide). Then simplify before you automate.

Map before you tool up

Who reads, who comments, who decides, who can block. Note the frequent exceptions (amount, contract type, urgency).

Fewer steps, more clarity

Every extra step adds another queue. Two or three solid steps beat a workflow of eight phantom boxes.

Assignment by role / department

Avoid assigning to a named person whenever you can: absences break the flow.

Explicit decisions

Approve, reject or request changes — not an “ok” lost in a 40-message thread.

Steps

An actionable sequence, from diagnosis to follow-up.

  1. Describe the current journey

    Take 5 recent contracts. For each one: who received the PDF, who approved it, how many days it took, where the file got stuck.

  2. Define types and thresholds

    E.g. NDA → legal only; supplier contract > €X → purchasing + legal + management. Write the rules down on one page.

  3. Design the minimal workflow

    Steps, assignments (role/department), available actions, target SLAs. Validate with the business teams before publishing.

  4. Connect upstream capture

    Without a single entry point, the workflow only sees some of your contracts. Link inbound e-mail / upload to the start of the flow.

  5. Publish and train people on tasks

    Approvers need to know where to find their inbox, how to request changes and what each status means.

  6. Measure bottlenecks

    Time per step, rework rate, overdue files. Adjust assignments and thresholds every month at the start.

Mistakes to avoid

The pitfalls that derail most document projects.

Recreating e-mail chaos inside the tool

If everyone is copied on every step, you have only changed channels. Assign, don’t broadcast.

A workflow that is too long at launch

An eight-step flow designed to “cover every case” kills adoption. Add complexity after real-world use.

No way to request changes

Without a “request changes” action, approvers reject or approve reluctantly — and the file goes back outside the tool.

Forgetting notifications

A workflow without alerts becomes a dead queue. Approvers must be notified on assignment and when an SLA is exceeded.

Approval automation checklist

  • Real journey of 5 contracts analysed
  • Threshold / type rules written down (1 page)
  • 2–3 step workflow designed and approved by the business teams
  • Assignments by role or department (not only by name)
  • Approve / reject / request-changes actions in place
  • Upstream capture linked to the start of the flow
  • Task inbox and notifications tested
  • Turnaround indicators defined

DocPilot to digitise the flow

DocPilot publishes multi-step workflows, assigns tasks and keeps the decision history on the document.

Published workflows

Steps assigned to a user, a role, a department or a domain — tailored to your organisation.

Actionable tasks

Approve, reject, request changes: every decision is recorded on the file.

Notifications and SLAs

Approvers are alerted; steps can carry a due date so that delays are flagged.

Document ↔ contract link

The enriched PDF (OCR / extraction) enters the flow with its business context already visible.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Can we keep e-signature outside DocPilot?

Yes. Automating internal approval (who says yes before signature) is independent of your signature tool. Once signed, the PDF returns to the repository as the reference version.

Do you need a different workflow for each contract type?

Two or three variants are often enough (simple / standard / strategic). Too many variants = maintenance overhead and routing errors.

How do you handle urgent cases?

Plan a documented short path (e.g. management alone below a threshold) rather than “bypassing” the tool. A tracked exception is better than an invisible one.

Who can see the approval history?

In DocPilot, the decision history stays attached to the document: useful for audits, disputes or onboarding a new manager.

Take action

Replace the e-mail thread with a clear flow

Publish your first DocPilot workflow, assign the steps and track approvals without chasing people manually.